I have 100Mb fiber so not a problem for me

well, I may not have as an insane a connection as =rubberman542 but I have a 10MB connect so I'm fine wit large images...

--
"All art requires courage." - Anne Tucker

But if you have to scroll to see the whole picture, it's annoying

--
Be nice to everyone!

I have an issue with too small pictures more then file sizes really!
I want to see some detail not a tiny little picture.

--
Do something generous today.
Who knows, you might like it very much.

a problem? Not at all, I even prefer larger images, there is so much more detail preserved than a blurry small jpeg...

I have a fast connection, but I hate it to scroll on "postersized" fullviews.

Like many of the deviants here, I prefer when the image can be full displayed on my screen; scrolling is much a pain in the ass.
So if the poll says size is not the matter, maybe a max. screen resolution poll would be interesting

--
Immortal until the death
my portfolio, Photosthésie

I have a fast connection, but my computer blows

--
=alder-sketch

98% of deviantART posters use a quote like this. If you're one of the 2% that doesn't, copy and paste this into your signature.

Go visit *vanlubeck and say, "Hi!"

Larger images are better - even on a low bandwidth connection (I usually have a fast one) its worth the wait to be able to discern details on thumbnails. For viewing individual works, a small size that just fits onto the screen or is a bit smaller is nice - full view is best so long as its not monstrously huge view - 3000 pixels across is getting silly on anything except perhaps stock images

--
^{Art
Design
Stock account}